So KoL were on our periphery for a while, and then my friend He Who Shares a Name With a Part of The City (you know who you are!) said that if we liked the music, we should check them out live. We've heard that about a lot of bands, and some have been better than others (I'm looking at you, Muse), but decided to give them a chance.
The First Time
It was the tour to support Because of the Times, one of the best album titles of the past few years, and they were playing Kool Haus, one of the worst club names of the past few years. We didn't have tickets, so we walked right up to the door and were able to get them. That was part of the thrill. The other part was seeing a band that is HUGE in England in such a small venue.
The show was all that was promised. They played straight ahead, with great ferocity, and stage chatter was kept to a minimum. I think it was pretty much "We're Kings of Leon" and "Thanks". The set might only be an hour long, but they could play an insane amount of songs in that time.
The Second Time
There were rumours of them coming back to town to play a twin bill with Black Rebel Motorcycle Club, but that never materialized. But we kept out ear to the ground and when we knew that
The interesting thing about this show was that KoL was being primed for a big breakthrough in North America. "Sex on Fire" was becoming a big radio hit, and the band had appeared on SNL. So while the first crowd was a mix of Anglophiles and True Believers, this crowd was full of, well, tourists. I went over the show in an earlier post. The show itself was great, the band was tight, but the experience in the trenches was much different.
The Third Time
We actually debated going to this show: ACC means big arena rock, and while KoL plays big arenas all over the UK, it seemed a little much for a band we'd seen in friendlier confines. When we found out that The Walkmen were opening, that sealed the deal.
The Walkmen are not, shall we say, a conventional band. They're kinda like The Velvet Underground had a baby with a lot of late 90s bands: their sound is idiosyncratic to put it mildly. They played a great, shambolic set for the few people who stayed around to listen to them. While they do have a soaring sound, a place like the ACC is not the best for them, especially when it's only about 1/3 full.
KoL came on afterwards, and played their typical, loud, tight set. There was a little more stage patter, and the show was augmented by a series of video screens that showed the band (more on that in another post). The set list was good, though some of my favorite older songs didn't get played, and "Slow Night, So Long" to me is always the show closer, not the first set closer.
What was interesting was the crowd. Because of the larger venue and increased exposure, it would be safe to say that there were a lot of tourists or newer fans who were more familiar with the new material. Whenever something from
Don't get me wrong: the show was great, the sound was amazing, and the Followill boys can rock the arena with the best of them. Their sound is still intimate, though, even if the experience is now.
ed note: I shouldn't write late at night. I mistakenly called Only by the Night Because of the Night. Thanks to a certain eagle eyed reader for picking up on that.
7 comments:
I've been contemplating seeing these guys live.
I've been following them since "Youth and Young Manhood". The album thereafter was good, but pretty much a repeat of their first. Then "Because of the Times" came out... made some great changes to their music.
But I can't say I'm terribly impressed with their latest effort. There are a few songs that are brilliant and some that are kind of ho-hum to me.
So thus my internal debate continues...
I suppose I could have commented with something worthwhile or something you'd care about, but... not today. :P
Random Guido quote: "Newsflash! The world does NOT revolve around you."
(Do you remember who you said that to? I do! :P)
At the risk of sounding like a Deadhead, you HAVE to see them live. There is something indescribable about the performance they put on. It's not a wild night of abandon like Pearl Jam, or catharsis like a Radiohead show. It's just straight ahead, focused, tight, rock.
We're not big fans of the new album, and it does have some not-so-great moments. I think it might be from using the studio more than they did on previous albums. But again, live it all works.
Get thee to a show, basically.
(And yes I do remember that statement, though out of context it looks like I was being mean, when in context it was actually kinda funny).
Pearl Jam is absolutely wonderful to watch live. It was also nice to see Matt Cameron live, even if it wasn't with Soundgarden.
(Oh, Chris Cornell, why must we ignore most everything you've done post 1997?... give or take a few Audioslave songs)
And I'm sorry for the quite seeming mean, as I only remember it in the most amusing sense. It sticks in my head probably more than it should, but it does make me grin every time I think of it.
Oh no, you weren't seeming mean. And it's STILL quite funny, like the many Twiggets based sound effects (VOOP! VOOP!)
As for Chris Cornell: He's stuck on suck.
I still can't believe he slipped me tongue.
At least it wasn't immediately after licking water that was leaking underneath a bathroom door or after licking a dead sculpin head.
Heh heh, I still use the 'Flash the world doesn't revolve you' term all the time, it's great in a navy where sarcasm reigns supreme.
Jonathan
Post a Comment